See Apex Automotive's 10-node org chart with PDF export, then watch PlantPilot AI extract CI actions, issues, and decisions from the Ford warranty meeting transcript.
PP
PLANTPILOT AI
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLATFORM
Facility:Apex Automotive Stamping LLCIATF 16949
Claude AI Live
Operations
Systems 9
Alert Rules
Intelligence
Org Charts 4
Meetings 3
OEM Intelligence
DMAIC Projects
CI Agent
Org Chart Builder
Apex Automotive Stamping LLC · 10 team members · Visual hierarchy · PDF export
Company View
Quality Dept
Production Dept
Export PDF
10 nodes · 3 levels · Last updated Jun 12
MW
Marcus Webb
Plant Manager
PLANT MGR
SR
Sandra Reyes
Quality Manager
QUALITY
TJ
Terrell Johnson
Plant Superintendent
PRODUCTION
LP
Lisa Park
Engineering Manager
ENGINEERING
RD
Rick Dolan
Maintenance Supervisor
MAINTENANCE
AH
Amir Hassan
Logistics Manager
LOGISTICS
CM
Carla Munoz
Safety Manager
HSE
DC
Devon Clarke
Quality Engineer
QE
KN
Kenji Nakamura
CMM Inspector
QE
BW
Brianna Walsh
Production Supervisor
PROD
Meeting Intelligence
Upload or paste any meeting transcript — PlantPilot AI extracts CI actions, issues, and decisions automatically
Ford Warranty Response — Emergency Planning Meeting
Jun 10, 2025 · 14:32
Marcus Webb, Sandra Reyes, Terrell Johnson, Devon Clarke · Ford Wayne Assembly escalation · Dimensional defect on PN AP-2247
5 actions extracted3 issues flagged2 decisions
Line 2 Scrap DMAIC Tollgate — Analyze Phase
Jun 5, 2025 · 09:15
Sandra Reyes, Lisa Park, Devon Clarke · DMAIC Analyze phase review · Root cause confirmation
Root cause confirmed3 actions
SMED Pilot Review — Line 1 Changeover
May 29, 2025 · 10:00
Terrell Johnson, Lisa Park, Brianna Walsh · SMED pilot week 3 · 28.75 min avg achieved
Target achievedMove to Control
Ford Warranty Response Meeting
Jun 10, 2025 · Marcus Webb, Sandra Reyes, Terrell Johnson, Devon Clarke · AI-extracted CI log
✅
ACTION — Devon Clarke
Complete CMM 100% inspection of 47 quarantined door brackets before June 12. Document results in PPAP package for Ford submission.
✅
ACTION — Sandra Reyes
Finalize and submit Ford 8D report by June 14. Include D1–D5 with regression data and controlled shipping confirmation.
✅
ACTION — Rick Dolan
Replace die insert on Tool AP-204 and restore PM schedule in SAP. Verify clearance to 0.008" before Line 2 restart.
🚨
ISSUE — SOP outdated at Station 4
Rev 1.8 still posted. Line operators have been running from superseded procedure since June 8 SOP update. Immediate replacement required.
📋
DECISION — Marcus Webb
Voluntary controlled shipping Level 1 to Ford Wayne Assembly begins immediately. Marcus to notify Ford SQE Kevin Marsh by EOD June 10.
PLANTPILOT AI · MEETING SUMMARY
This meeting established Apex's formal Ford response plan. Key risk: the 8D must reach Ford by June 14 to avoid escalation to Q1 status review. Devon Clarke's CMM sort is the critical path — if any of the 47 units fail, controlled shipping scope may widen.
PlantPilot AI has added all 5 extracted items to the Action Plan Tracker and tagged Devon Clarke, Sandra Reyes, and Rick Dolan with due dates. The outdated SOP at station 4 is also flagged as an open 5S corrective action.
Next review recommended: June 14 — post-8D submission.
Section 4.2.3 — PPAP submission now requires digital CMM reports in addition to paper ballooned drawing
△
Section 7.1 — 8D response window reduced from 30 days to 21 days for Severity 1 issues
+
Section 9.4 — New requirement: SPC control charts mandatory for all Tier 1 safety-critical features
PLANTPILOT AI · IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rev F introduces 3 compliance gaps for Apex. The 21-day 8D window is the highest risk — your current Ford response SOP references 30 days. The new SPC requirement affects 2 safety-critical features on part AP-7714. Recommend updating your PPAP checklist and 8D SOP before next Ford audit.
CI Agent — OEM Requirements Context
Ford, GM, and Stellantis requirements injected automatically — the agent knows your OEM obligations before you ask
OEM CONTEXT INJECTED INTO AGENT PROMPT
Ford CS-101
8D response: 21 days (Rev F). PPAP requires digital CMM. SPC mandatory for safety-critical features.
GP-12 early containment required for any field escape. BIQS Level 3 maintained — no open findings.
GM PPAP
Level 3 PPAP required for all new parts. Full package submission including dimensional, material, and functional results.
Stellantis SPS
SPS Level 4 required. Supplier scorecard reviewed quarterly. Any RED rating triggers development plan within 30 days.
Context active · Ford CS-101 Rev F · Ford Q1 · GM BIQS · Stellantis SPS · IATF 16949 · Apex Automotive Stamping
MW
We're about to submit a PPAP to Ford for part AP-7714. What do I need to include under Rev F?
PP
PLANTPILOT AI · FORD CS-101 REV F
Under Rev F, your Ford PPAP for AP-7714 must include: (1) Digital CMM report — Rev F Section 4.2.3 added this alongside the paper ballooned drawing (Rev E only required paper). (2) SPC control charts for all safety-critical features — AP-7714 has 2 flagged features per your ETQ data, so these are mandatory. (3) Full dimensional and functional results at Level 3. The 8D response window is now 21 days if Ford raises any PPAP concerns. Want me to generate a Rev F PPAP checklist for AP-7714?
10-Node Org ChartBuilt from Apex's real team structure. PlantPilot AI references this hierarchy in every document, 8D report, and action assignment it generates.
PDF Export + Department ViewsExport any org chart to PDF, or zoom into individual departments. The CI agent references the org chart when assigning action owners.
Meeting Transcript IntelligenceUpload or paste any meeting transcript and PlantPilot AI extracts every action, issue, and decision — tagged to owners with due dates.
Auto-Added to Action TrackerEvery extracted action item is automatically added to the Action Plan Tracker with owner, due date, and priority — no manual entry.
3 OEM Portals SyncedPlantPilot AI syncs Ford, GM, and Stellantis supplier portals and uses AI to extract requirements — then alerts you when a document changes so you're never caught out by a spec update.
OEM-Aware CI AgentFord CS-101 Rev F, GM BIQS, and Stellantis SPS requirements are injected into every CI Agent conversation — so answers reference your actual OEM obligations, not generic quality advice.